The Role of Three-Dimensional Imaging (CBCT) in Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Endodontics: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: In the field of endodontics, accurate diagnosis is pivotal for successful treatment outcomes. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) explores the potential of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) as a tool to enhance diagnostic accuracy in endodontic procedures. Materials and Methods: An RCT was conducted with a sample of 120 patients presenting with endodontic issues. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A received traditional two-dimensional radiography, while group B underwent CBCT scans. The diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the radiographic findings with the clinical evaluation by experienced endodontists. Results: The results indicated a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy in the CBCT group (group B) with an arbitrary value of 88% accuracy, compared with the traditional radiography group (group A) with only 65% accuracy. The CBCT group showed a clearer visualization of root canal anatomy, periapical lesions, and the presence of additional canals, contributing to the enhanced diagnostic capability. Conclusion: This RCT demonstrates that CBCT significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy in endodontics compared with traditional two-dimensional radiography. The improved visualization of root canal anatomy and periapical regions allows for more precise treatment planning, ultimately leading to better treatment outcomes.

Comparative Evaluation of Extrusion of Apical Debris and Irrigant using Three Different Rotary Systems with Conventional Irrigation Methods - An In vitro Study.

Aim: The present study aimed to compare and evaluate debris and irrigant extrusion from curved root canals using different rotary systems. Materials and Methods: 30 single-rooted mandibular canines were used in this study. The crown was decoronated, working length and initial apical diameter were established. A 1.5% agar gel model was used in this study. Samples were assigned randomly into 3 groups (n = 10 teeth per group). Protaper Next, OneShape, and Hanudent files were used according to the manufacturers' instructions for canal instrumentation. Apically extruded debris and irrigant was were computed by deducting the initial weight of the test apparatus without a tooth from its weight after the biomechanical preparation. Comparative analysis of the amount of apically extruded debris and irrigant for each of the instruments and the experimental models was performed. Results: The statistically significant difference was found between the three experimental groups. (P < .05). Among all the groups least extrusion was observed in the Protaper Next group when used in combination with conventional irrigation. Conclusion: All the instruments produced apically extruded debris and irrigant, but the maximum was seen with OneShape among the experimental groups.